Goethe Yearbook

From the Goethe Yearbook Editors

Sarah Vandegrift Eldridge and Eleanor ter Horst

This 33rd volume of the Goethe Yearbook is our third as coeditors of the journal and, at the midpoint of our editorship, we wanted to take the opportunity to reflect on our experiences and discuss with other editors of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century journals the scholarly trends that they have observed, as well as the challenges and opportunities of editing a pre-twentieth-century journal. The result is the “Editors’ Roundtable” that appears in this volume. We are fortunate to have received contributions from a wide variety of journal editors, truly a multidisciplinary and international group. Among the diverse perspectives represented, there are also agreements about emerging scholarly trends and the importance of scholarship on eighteenth- and nineteenth-century topics. Currently, in the United States, where universities are being pressured to capitulate to political demands, where humanistic inquiry is increasingly devalued,and where our democratic institutions  are under siege, a reexamination of eighteenth-century literary and philosophical trends, which form the foundation of modern universities and democratic societies, seems evermore crucial. We hope that the contents of the current volume, produced at a challenging moment for us as editors and for the broader scholarly community, will attest to the vivacity and continued relevance of scholarship on eighteenth- and nineteenth-century topics.

The first article in this volume, Donald Wehrs’s “Aesthetic Healing of Divisiveness or Evasion of Politics in Goethe’s Unterhaltungen deutscher Ausgewanderten,” addresses the question of whether the arts can serve as an antidote to political extremism and the social divisions that it engenders. Goethe’s novella, set during the French Revolution and engaging diverse perspectives on that conflict, enables, according to Wehrs, a debate about whether aesthetic education provides a solution to political divisions or simply an escape from such conflicts. Xuxu Song’s “Ancient Greek Idyll Fragments, Translation, and Outline Illustrations: Sympoesie and Symphilosophie in the Athenaeum (1798-1800)” offers another perspective on aesthetics and sociability, as it explores how the journal as a whole creates community across languages, art forms, and eras through aesthetic practices such as collections of classical idylls, translation, and illustrations of poetry. Luke Rylander’s essay “Do Witches Belong in the Kitchen? The Gender Economy of the “Hexenküche” in Goethe’s Faust” explores the intersection of gendered discourses with economic structures in this crucial scene of Goethe’s drama. Rylander concludes that the scene offers alternatives to profit-driven, gender-normative societal constructions by emphasizing pleasure-focused relationships and a play-oriented economy, establishing “a genuine countermodel to patriarchal capitalism.” Jeffrey Jarzomb’s “Fact, Fiction, and Volk: Prescription and Action in Engel Christine Westphalen’s Charlotte Corday,” examines the depiction of the Volk in Westphalen’s drama as an easily misled entity with a potential for violence. Jarzomb shows how this depiction, through a reversal of history, places the blame for the Terror on the Jacobin leader, Jean-Paul Marat, and strips the Volk of any potential for collective action. Taken together, these four articles explore links between aesthetic creativity, collectivity, and sociability that have continuing resonance today.

A further contribution to the scholarship of this period consists of two original manuscripts by E.T.A. Hoffmann, which Dennis Schäfer discovered in the Beinecke Library at Yale University. In an introduction, Schäfer explains the provenance and relevance of these manuscripts from the final section of Hoffmann’s Brief des Kapellmeisters Kreisler an den Baron Wallborn. Schäfer also provides a facsimile of the manuscripts, a transcription, and a translation.

This volume’s Forum section, titled “Inclinations: Männerfreundschaften/Frauenfreundschaften,” emerged from an international fellowship program and subsequent conference organized by Imke Meyer, Heidi Schlipphacke, and Sigrid Nieberle. The contributions by Heidi Schlippacke, Helmut Puff, Sigrid Nieberle, Sophie Salvo, Wolfgang Bunzel, and Imke Meyer explore same-sex male and female friendships and relationships as depicted in literature, letters, music, and philosophical dialogue through the notion of Neigungen (inclinations), a term encompassing homosocial, homoerotic, and homosexual bonds and presenting alternatives to our twentieth- and twenty-first-century categories of friendship and desire.

Taken together, the intellectual offerings of this issue invite us to consider our realities, past and present, as well as possible alternatives—political and aesthetic—for the future.

FROM THE YEARBOOK EDITORS

In the midst of another challenging year, we are grateful to our authors, manuscript evaluators, and book reviewers—the latter so ably corralled by Sean Franzel—and, last but not least, our indefatigable copy editor, Monica Birth, who have all enabled us to put together another fascinating volume. Like the predecessors it has been our honor to edit, volume 29 of the Goethe Yearbook represents continuity and innovation; what sets it apart is the fact that several essays seem to continue the conversation begun in last year's issue.

Edward Potter's essay on Anton Reiser speaks to both the unabating pursuit of scholarship on Karl Philipp Moritz (which we have featured frequently over the past two years) as well as the renewed interest in questions of sentimentalism as a literary period and eighteenth-century style. But Potter also turns to questions of sexuality and gender. These questions, focused in concepts of patriarchy and its disruption, are at the core of Birgit Jensen's essay, which branches out into broader concerns about cultural legacies and myth and invites their ongoing consideration. Befittingly, two more essays revolve around such questions, albeit in vastly different ways. History of philosophy and science scholar Oriane Petteni introduces a novel model of reading Goethe's morphology, reminding us that questions of algorithms and pattern recognition are no longer confined to digital humanities and computational studies of literature but have arrived as part and parcel of our methodological toolkit. And Robert Kelz takes us again to Argentina. In a fascinating prequel to last year's essay on Goethe commemorations, he invites us back into the complex politics of Buenos Aires in the twentieth century and the role of a German cultural icon. Equally compelling, Kelz invokes a transnational fascination with archival material and the cultural policies both hidden and exposed in them—particularly welcome at a time when onsite research ceased being an option for so many of us, unable to physically access the treasure troves of our work. The penultimate freestanding essay in this volume, Barry Murnane's reconsideration of Goethe's Weltliteratur in the context of Handelsverkehr (trade) with China continues a conversation about the worldliness of eighteenth-century German literature and culture that has been vigorous for some time now and gestures well beyond the uptake of individual concepts or motifs. Coincidentally, it also invites further dialogue with forthcoming or fresh-off-the-press books (at the time of this writing). We hope these, too, will be well received once this volume arrives in your mailboxes. And any essay on conceptual and material trade reaches beyond this volume and anticipates the next. Beyond words, texts, and eighteenth-century worlds, we are looking forward to animated conversations about "Goethe's Things"—his "Gespräch mit den Dingen," or dialogue with objects. We hope to feature many facets of the latter in volume 30, devoted to work first presented at the Atkins Goethe Conference 2020, planned for November 2021 at the University of Chicago.

In another novelty, we feature not one but two special sections. One, quite naturally, commemorates an anniversary, Hölderlin's 250th birthday. It contains work devoted to "reading and exhibiting," first presented in collaboration with the DLA Marbach and its American Friends and here compiled by Meike Werner. The other special section, on movement, edited by Heidi Schlipphacke, picks up on research first featured at MLA 2021 and revisits many questions of sentimentalism, visuality, and narration that are at the core of canon formation and eighteenth-century thresholds of modernity. We take it as a good sign that the last essay in this section, by Eleanor ter Horst, challenges us to think about and rethink collaboration and dialogue as constitutive of authorship, just like our robust review section invites our collective engagement with terrific scholarship in eighteenth-century studies. We close these prefatory remarks with the reiteration of gratitude to all those who made yet another pandemic Yearbook possible. The work represented in this volume continues to energize the discipline in challenging ways during challenging times. 

Patricia Anne Simpson

Birgit Tautz

From the Yearbook Editors

Volume 27 of the Goethe Yearbook introduces an array of formats to pursue research on Goethe, his age, and his contemporaries; and to encourage new modes of collaboration. A range of articles by established and emerging authors contributes to the rich and growing archive of scholarship on German eighteenth-century studies, with focal points on Goethe, Karl Philipp Moritz, and Rahel Levin Varnhagen.

In addition, several articles reconsider topics such as Goethe’s personal library and cultural heritage, Goethean anthropology, and the intellectual hub of Weimar. This volume launches the first Forum, a section comprised of invited contributions on an important topic of debate in the profession. For the debut, we asked colleagues engaged in Digital Humanities research to consider the canon in comparison to “the great unread” (Margaret Cohen): a vast expanse of non-canonical texts.

We are also pleased to publish a newly discovered text by August von Kotzebue, with an introduction and annotated transcription by a widely respected historian. Finally, we draw attention to robust, ongoing scholarship that will be one of the projects championed by the Goethe Society for years to come. We are delighted to include two sample entries from the prodigious work in progress, the Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, edited by Clark Muenzer and John H. Smith. Bryan Klausmeyer serves as digital editor. The customary book review section rounds out the volume. We have begun receiving submissions for volume 28 and invite colleagues to share ideas about potential Forum topics and special sections.

Note that the Goethe Yearbook is a double-blind, peer-reviewed publication, widely indexed, and published with DOIs. All manuscripts should be prepared in Microsoft Word, and in accordance with the Yearbook’s style sheet and anonymized for review. Manuscript submissions should be no longer than 8,500 words.

Patricia Anne Simpson, University of Nebraska

Birgit Tautz, Bowdoin College

From the Yearbook Editors

Volume 26 of the Goethe Yearbook, featuring a special section on Goethe’s narrative events and also showcasing work presented at the 2017 Atkins Goethe Conference, will reach the readership soon. Volume 27 is well underway.

For the first time, the Goethe Yearbook is implementing a new format for scholarship and discussion, beginning with a Forum. The working title is “The Canon versus the ‘Great Unread’ (M. Cohen).” With this topic, we hope to prompt a vibrant discussion about the impact of Digital Humanities (DH) and “computational criticism” on Goethe scholarship and 18th-century German Studies. The editors have secured the cooperation of prominent and emerging scholars in the field to contemplate questions such as: What is the relationship between “mining” thousands of texts through algorithms and scholarship “merely” based on interpretation of select literary works? What are the consequences of digitizing primary materials? How do DH methodologies and analytical practices enhance and/or endanger the study of the canon? How does “close reading” versus “distant reading” affect the legacy of canonical authors and their impact on the construction of national literary historiography in the 19th century? What is at stake for the discipline of literary study—for the act of (close) reading—when we ask the question about the canon versus the “great unread”?

The contributions uncover many approaches to the topic that go beyond established scholarly methods v. data sciences, including but not limited to questions of “digital canons” and “forgotten canons,” the significance of paratexts and metadata, alternative reading histories, and DH as a way of navigating the gendered fault-lines of canon formation. Others tackle um 1800 as a primary archaeological site for the digital or reveal the massive amounts of Goethe corpus that are never cited.

The Forum will appear along with a series of articles on Rahel Levin Varnhagen, Friedrich Hölderlin, Goethe’s self-marketing, Goethe and visual culture, eighteenth-century refugee discourse, and others.

Patricia Anne Simpson, University of Nebraska

Birgit Tautz, Bowdoin College

Invitation to Submit your Work to the GYB

Dear colleagues,With vol. 26 in production, we want to reach out again and invite you to submit your work for consideration in the next Goethe Yearbook (to appear in 2020). Please send us manuscripts by February 15, 2019.As always, we welcome manuscripts on any and all aspects of Goethe, his contemporaries, and the 18th century broadly conceived, including the century’s legacy. We also are interested in broadening the discussion, in organizing special sections, and experimenting with new forms and genres of scholarly writing. Please contact us with any and all suggestions at editors@goethesociety.org!Note that the Goethe Yearbook is a double-blind, peer-reviewed publication, widely indexed, and published with DOIs. All manuscripts should be prepared in MS Word, and in accordance with the Yearbook’s style sheet and anonymized for review. Manuscript submissions should be no longer than 8,500 words.

Patricia Anne SimpsonUniversity of Nebraska

Birgit TautzBowdoin College

With very best wishes for the holiday season and 2019,Birgit and Patty